13 Fat Loss Methods That Don’t Work
The world of health and fitness is full of weird and, ironically, unhealthy ways to lose fat from your body. I’ve pulled together 13 of the most common methods people try when attempting to rid themselves of stubborn fat.
Some of these will SHOCK you!
The real question is how many of these have you tried, or how many of these are you still attempting?
1. Crunches: If I had a dollar… you know where this is heading… I get tired of telling people that crunches are just no good for fat loss. How can I convince you that crunches really don’t have a place in your training program if you are short on time and fat loss is your goal. Really there are many more exercises out there that take les time, work your metabolism harder, and subsequently help you lose fat from your midsection.
2. Jogging: In a study that compared aerobic exercise(read jogging) and diet with a group who just did the diet over a 12 week period, the exercise group trained 5 times a week with 45 minutes of aerobic exercise. Those doing exercise and diet showed no difference in body fat levels after 12 weeks than those just dietting. Basically the exercise had no effect on fat loss!!! Stop jogging.
3. Thigh Master: This little invention was originally an ugly contraption designed as an all body training tool, but was then popularized by a TV advert with Susan Somers in a leotard. The idea was it would tone the muscles on the inside of your legs and became one of the biggest selling fitness infomercial products of all time. The problem is it didn’t help you lose lots of body fat.
4. Tricep Extensions: You may have picked up a can of baked beans or a milk carton, bent forward and swung the “weight” backwards, working the muscles in the back of your arm. Once again, the same with crunches, because you are only working a small amount of muscle mass, the overall effect for the amount of time spent doing this exercise makes it really not worth it. Pick exercises that are going to work larger areas of muscle, to boost your metabolism and help burn fat from the whole of your body.
5. Pilates: I can hear the cries of horror and the voodoo dolls of my body being pierced by the passionate Pilates bunch right now. Despite pilates being the cure from everything from low back pain to the common cold(i’m joking), it is not the ideal solution for fat loss, the intensity for 99% of the population is too low and will not enduce enough of a metabolic response for the fast fat loss we are looking for.
6. Low Calorie Diets: I don’t count calories, never have done, I don’t ask my clients to either. Cutting calories below a certain level makes your body want to hold on to long term energy resources, i.e. FAT, the very substance we are trying to lose. Excessive calorie restriction is not a long term solution, and more often than not you end up with more fat than you started with.
7. Low Fat Diets: A study compared a low carb diet and a low fat diet with the same overall calorie intake. Those with a low carb diet, and obviously higher in fat content lost more fat from their body. No need to cut fat, just make sure the fat you eat is not from cookies and cakes (no surprise there), the fat in eggs for example, is good fat.
8. Missing Meals: Skipping breakfast or lunch is very common. Problem is your body goes in to this starvation mode when you do skip the meal, holding on to the fat reserves in your body. NEVER skip breakfast, lunch or dinner, or even the snacks between meals. Consume something every 2-3 hours of your waking day.
9. Body Wraps: Here we go another group of people I am destined to upset. Body wraps do nothing more than sweat out water from your wrapped body parts, you will not lose fat, just gain back the water weight when you rehydrate yourself after the wrap… Save you money, start eating and drinking cleaner products.
10. Nordic Walking: Yet another group of rather passionate people who will tell you that their exercise is the cure for everything. The majority of nordic walkers are people walking around creating extra resistance by dragging a couple of sticks behind them! The intensity is essentially aerobic in nature and just not hard enough to create a longer term metabolic effect to lose the fat.
11. Diet Pills: Most of these pills are nothing more than a method of increasing the body’s temperature. They are not a long term fat loss solution, once you stop popping the pills as you cannot afford them any longer, the fat will come back as your diet will still suck.
12. Power Plates: I must be going for a record of how many groups of people I can upset in one BLOG post… Vibration technology is (or was) the latest all encompassing solution to peoples fat loss woes. Unfortunately most peopl who bought the machines are discovering the effectiveness and novelty of these machines wears thin very quickly.
13. Fasting: Last but not least, good old starvation. I’ve come across plenty of people who will go on a 7 day fast, consuming nothing but water and some nasty soup. As mentioned in two of the other items above, simply cutting calories means the body will do everything in its power to hold on to long term energy source. Fat. It will break down high energy consuming substances in the body, i.e Muscle and make your metabolism even slower than it was in the first place. DO NOT damage your fat burning system any more with fasting. Short term weight loss will lead to fat gain and a more ugly body!
Do you disagree with me?
If so please comment below. I would be surprised if none of this have touched a nerve or raised an eyebrow for you. Let me know you bighgest question relating to shedding kilos. I’ll do my best to answer them over the coming weeks.
7 Responses to “13 Fat Loss Methods That Don’t Work”
Leave a Reply







Jolein on March 24th, 2009
Dear Tim,
If you don’t wan to lose fat, but want to get your body more ‘tight’, can crunches then be good?
Kind regards,
Jolein
Karen on March 24th, 2009
I know you are expecting this from me so here goes…
I agree with you fully that Pilates is not the fastest form of fat loss if done in isolation, neither is it designed to be (at least not in all the literature I have).
However, in conjunction with other fat loss programmes, I strongly believe it can bring huge benefits including building a stronger core which also equals flatter stomach (look how easy Noleen found the plank from day one and we all know how many times you mention the word core strength in your workouts), this in turn protects the back, helps prevent muscular imbalance, improves flexibility and with that comes protection from injury.
I am fairly new to Pilates but have already seen benefits of combining it with Forest Fit
admin on March 25th, 2009
Thanks for the comment Karen…
I probably don’t help my cause much with Pilates. I actually believe it is a great tool for building core strength and teaching people to make strong functional movements. I do get annoyed by the claims in various media that it is effective for fat loss, it is a bit like watching paint dry if fat loss is your goal.
admin on March 25th, 2009
Hi Jolein
No easy way to answer this without going off on a rant about crunches. Getting a “tight” body in my book is about losing excess body fat and building a little bit more muscle size. To do this then crunches are once again a really slow way to achieve this. You can achieve the same effect by doing exercises that work more than just the tiny strip of muscle on the front of your stomach. Working more muscles throughout the WHOLE body will achieve what you call a “tight” body, with less effort and 10 times the result of crunches!
Tim
Rainer Rohde on March 26th, 2009
Excellent list there!
Even though I do believe from my own past experiences that a minimum(!) of 45 minutes of aerobic exercise, such as jogging, does work.
From what I understand, the body fat is being burned after ~45 minutes, so everything under 45 minutes is kinda pointless for burning excessive fat, but still works your metabolism (ruins your knees, as well).
I am new to this site and I am actually embarking on my own weight-loss quest right now. I currently weigh ~130kg,all of which I gained during my years in the US. My goal is to be back at my “ideal” weight which should be, according to my height, ~80kg. Not sure if that’s ever going to fly.
What I did to get started is to first work on my paradigms, then flipping the switch in my head to start *something* in the first place….
So, I am sure that your site will serve as inspiration to my quest.
Is there an accountability group around here somewhere as well??
Cheers,
Rainer
admin on March 27th, 2009
Hi Rainer
The problem with the theory of 45 minutes of minimum work is that it looks at the exercise in isolation for the amount of calories burnt. Whilst your body is burning fat at that intensity as soon as you stop exercising your metabolism returns to its pre exercise levels very quickly.
With an interval based routine, that lasts only 25 minutes, with short intense periods of effort will mean you metabolism is elevated long after the workout. Some studies suggest as long as 36 hours after the workout…. I know which way of training I would prefer to do
Because you are working for less time, the impact on your knees is substantially less.
I am in the process of creating a special community site. This is currently at http://timgoodwin.ning.com
Rainer Rohde on March 29th, 2009
Thanks for the comment, Tim.
So, with that in mind, what would you suggest? I am at the point now where I can make it 30 minutes on that machine in one go. Should I work towards 2 more intense (as in faster paced) sessions of 25 mins each, with a break in between (for how long?) in which I could work on my upper body?
Nice site, there, Tim. I signed up.
Cheers,
Rainer